Map the actual procedure
Ask a person familiar with the work to outline preparation, main steps, checking, and cleanup. Then watch whether those steps can be understood from the proposed first-person view. A process diagram may include invisible decisions or machine states; identify these early and decide whether additional metadata is needed instead of inventing labels from the video.
Identify sensitive capture areas
Walk through likely camera movement and note screens, documents, badges, bystanders, and adjacent conversations. Establish where recording must stop, which areas are excluded, and who reviews the result. These are planning inputs for a source-specific permissions and handling review. They do not establish that a location or every person who appears has been approved for the project.
Test ordinary working conditions
Review footage while the participant bends, reaches, changes tools, and moves between stations. Check whether protective equipment or clothing affects the camera and whether audio includes unrelated material. Record any changes made for filming. A task performed differently for the camera should be documented so the buyer can assess how closely it resembles the intended setting.
Separate acceptance decisions
Use one review for technical integrity, another for procedure coverage, and a documented process for restricted content. An otherwise clear task may still need to be excluded. Require session identifiers and review status so affected recordings can be traced. Send Fiund the procedure, permitted setting, intended use, and review requirements for a feasibility discussion.
Review checklist
- Map steps to observable evidence
- Define excluded spaces and content
- Test clothing and normal movement
- Keep review status at session level