Define what the duration includes
A session can contain active work, searching, travel, idle intervals, and unusable footage. State which of these count toward the requested volume. If tasks overlap, clarify how task durations are summarized without treating the same interval as independent footage multiple times. A total becomes useful when the unit and counting convention are explicit.
Count meaningful coverage units
Depending on the project, useful summaries may include complete episodes, participants, environments, object instances, or annotated interactions. None of these replaces technical review, but together they explain what the footage contains. Ask how many tasks repeat one setup and which combinations remain sparse. A larger duration may simply repeat the same easy activity for longer. Keep category definitions stable when comparing alternative source proposals.
Connect coverage to model needs
For temporal reasoning, long context may be essential; for a particular hand-object event, the relevant question may be how often that event is observable. Describe the target supervision and required variation. This makes the sourcing inquiry more informative than an isolated hours target and helps reveal where annotation effort differs between superficially similar collections.
Review quality and scope together
Report exclusions and uncertain examples rather than hiding them inside a headline volume. Distinguish captured, reviewed, and proposed-for-delivery quantities where those stages exist. Fiund can assess a brief with target duration and category coverage, but this site does not claim that a named quantity or every requested activity is currently available from an approved source.
Review checklist
- Define the duration counting rule
- Summarize complete tasks and variation
- Measure observable target events
- Keep review stages and exclusions explicit